Local News

Newburgh Ends Flock Camera Contract, but Town Still Has 58 Cameras

The city has ended its agreement with the license-plate surveillance company, while cameras remain in operation in the separate town of Newburgh. Residents pushed for answers on how Flock data is used at the Oct. 13 town board meeting.
Newburgh Ends Flock Camera Contract, but Town Still Has 58 Cameras
A Flock Safety license plate reader is seen along a public road, Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025, in Houston. (AP Photo/David Goldman, File)

The Town of Newburgh’s use of Flock Safety cameras came under fire at the town board meeting Wednesday evening. 

The Town of Newburgh has 58 Flock Safety License Plate Readers (LPRs), according to Freedom of Information (FOIL) request records. The documents were originally obtained by community residents’ FOIL requests and verified by Radio Catskill.

Flock Safety cameras are specialized Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) designed for neighborhood, commercial, and law enforcement use to record and analyze vehicle data. The equipment captures license plates, vehicle make, color, and other unique features.

Thousands of law enforcement agencies use Flock technology, but across the country, residents are increasingly bringing forward concerns that the company’s data is being shared with outside agencies, specifically to assist with federal immigration activities.

Documents show that Newburgh’s Flock Safety camera order was signed by Town of Newburgh Police Chief Donald Campbell dated March 26, 2024. 

Other FOIL records verified by Radio Catskill show the Town of Newburgh’s Police Department paid Flock a total of $357,000 to date. The first payment was on June 12, 2024, and the latest payment was on Sept. 16, 2026.

Residents push for answers on Flock

Residents at the Oct. 13 Town of Newburgh board meeting questioned how long the Town retains the data from its ALPR cameras, which agencies can access it, where Flock cameras are located, and more broadly the process for how the Flock contract was initially approved back in 2024.

Newburgh resident Gabrielle Gray said she wants the cameras taken down. She regularly drives her two children around Newburgh when she sees Flock Safety cameras around her neighborhood.

“It’s not even as if I could plan, ‘Oh you know what? I feel uncomfortable with these things. Let me try to find a different way to my kid’s piano lesson or go to the gym on a different route.’ It’s simply not possible to want to live your life without being traced constantly,” said Gray.

Police Chief Campbell described Flock cameras as an “eyewitness,” a tool that can help identify suspect vehicles after an incident or crime has occurred. 

“This is a game changer considering that we live in an area known as the ‘Crossroads of the Northeast’ where two major interstates intersect and a suspect can be miles away before police can identify what happened,” said Campbell. “This has led to dozens of arrests for incidents that may never have been solved and presumably prevents additional crimes and additional victims.”

He said the police department retains data from its Flock cameras for 30 days but is considering reducing the retention period to seven days.

Campbell also said that the cameras are the property of the Town of Newburgh Police Department but the department does allow other agencies with “a valid law enforcement reason and complaint number to search for a specific plate #. This means that the other law enforcement agency has identified a suspect vehicle and they wish to see if that vehicle travelled through our jurisdiction.”

Local governments across the Mid-Hudson Valley region have joined the growing wave of municipalities cancelling their Flock contracts. The City of Newburgh voted in September to discontinue its routine use of Flock cameras, while Dutchess County announced it would remove its 65 Flock cameras last month.

The Town of Newburgh will hold a public forum on Flock cameras on Oct. 29 at 7 p.m. at the Town of Newburgh Town Hall. Town Supervisor Gil Piaquadio said he’s reached out to both the ACLU and Flock Safety to participate.

Town of Newburgh Supervisor Gil Piaquadio discuss an upcoming Oct. 29 town hall on Flock Safety cameras at the Oct. 13, 2026 Town of Newburgh board meeting in Newburgh, N.Y. (Photo Credit: Kimberly Izar)

Resident Joshua Huckabee has been working to gather more information about the Town’s Flock usage. “The most important thing is the one question [the Town of Newburgh hasn’t] answered, and that’s who outside of Newburgh has searched our data?”

Huckabee says it’s no coincidence that ICE is looking to expand its footprint in Newburgh. 

Radio Catskill reported that ICE funded a new federal contract for “repair or alteration of office buildings” in Newburgh. The contract doesn’t specify which property. The latest award comes months after the federal government leased a 42,377-square-foot warehouse in Newburgh for $35.5 million.

“ One of the reasons I suspect ICE would like to put a facility in Newburgh is because we have all of these cameras around town, and we know that they can access them, and they’ll be able to… you know, if there’s one at Fostertown School, why do they need to know where our children are at?” said Huckabee. 

READ: New Federal Government Award Renews Questions About ICE Presence in Orange County

“What I really hope happens is the cameras come down, the ICE facility is stopped, and Newburgh can continue to be Newburgh without all of this happening in our backyard.”

Residents can share comments and questions about the Town’s Flock contract with the Town of Newburgh at flock-questions-comments@townofnewburgh.org.

NEWS BY AREA
LOCAL PULSE
LEAVE A COMMENT
One thought on “Newburgh Ends Flock Camera Contract, but Town Still Has 58 Cameras”
  1. To the Newsroom radiocatskill:

    I am writing to urge you to cover the Orange Co, NY Sheriff race.
    The incumbent running for re-election is Sheriff Paul Arteta, who filed a lawsuit against Gov Kathy Hochul along with 14 other NY Sheriffs. It is not getting enough coverage with 3 weeks left to the election and early voting will begin in NY in 11 days.

    The lawsuit is being sponsored and funded by F.A.I.R- Federation for American Immigration Reform, founded in 1979, as an anti-immigration group. It has an agenda, that had ties to the KKK and White Nationalism at the onset. One of the founders lobbied against Jewish immigration to the US from Germany as Hitler rose to power.

    The sheriffs are suing the citizens of NY, over the ‘Local Law, Local Crimes’ Act the NY state legislature passed, which ends ICE cooperation with our local law enforcement agencies. The Act was not a rushed or casual deliberation, it took 2 years of evolution and ended in months of compromises.

    Sheriff Arteta never informed the County Legislature he would engage in this lawsuit, the details of his grievances, he never informed the voters. The Legislature wrote him a formal letter asking him respond to questions that were raised at the public hearing by citizens, and questions the Legislators had themselves. It was a unanimous letter signed by both political parties. They gave Sheriff Arteta 2 weeks to respond to this letter, and in those 14 days, he failed to respond, or provide respect or context at all.

    With the ICE-Newburgh facility taking shape, there are large contracts to be had- ICE is in the process of hiring 5000 more agents nationwide. Skip Tracing contracts are in the works with plans to ramp up detaining and deporting immigrant children unaccompanied by adults that are turning 18 yo, beginning in December of this year. It is critical the voters are made aware of the situation in our county so they have context of what their vote endorses.

    OC Legislator Chairwoman, Laurie Tautel, Dist 14, made a statement at the Newburgh Town Board this evening, 845-281-4840
    Legislator Jonathan Redeker, Dist 2, is willing to make a statement, 845-916-5300
    Legislator Genesis Ramos, Dist 4, is willing to give a statement, 845-806-1021

    Thank you in advance for your attention,

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *